(continuation of proposal report)
Suggested Timeline of Project:
Using a PERT chart the table below details the key activities and amount of weeks needed to complete the activity. For example, Activity A: was given 4 weeks to seek out students and lecturers volunteers that would want to be part of this community to investigate changing the current learning space.
Below the table is a flow diagram showing how what activity connects (or flows) to another activity. For example, the committee finalizing the design receives flows from the Charrette workshops and stakeholders and from the Information Technology department, that determines the digital requirements to meet design purpose of building the digital pod-communities.
Participatory
Designing Process: A committee of learners and students was formed to examine
the current state of the learning space. The committee established the basic
premise that the current space was both outdated and not future focus. The new
design would need input from larger sections of stakeholders, and a series of
charrette workshops were completed to allow all stakeholder produce a
conceptual design within the workshops.
Once the
workshops were completed the ideas were evaluated both for pedagogical benefits
and technological feasibility from Information technology experts. The design
committee finalise the proposal and then submitted their idea and costings to
the university sub-committee for approval and funding of the project. Once
approval was obtained the equipment and design was completed, and a grand
opening was undertaken, to allow the various users and stakeholders of the new
learning space, evaluate its purpose and success.
No comments:
Post a Comment